Thứ Sáu, 30 tháng 9, 2016

Your religion?

Having many overseas Vietnamese friends are asking your religion  are brisk but that no religious affiliation at all.

Your religion Since the answer that would not do. The world is full of social movements demanding freedom and all that. Faith is also a kind of freedom, who want to follow what they follow, not follow it alone, no one has the right to impose the faith to others.
But it seems that something is wrong in the other answers, most never finished speaking, as well as tutoring a proud looking proud, mercy mercy itself buckled buckled up. 
I used in many religious places: India, and Rome “with holy spirit as piglet piled rolling,” in a poem of Evtushenko blasphemous. These multi-religious place, polytheistic religion, people can not imagine someone not affiliated with any religion. no religion as synonymous with street sex not. because it is the concept of religion is a human attribute – human womb is a religion as well as the womb to have sex. there’s little swagger back claiming no sex? 
Likewise, it is not conceivable that religious people do not know how to live the religion. Religion as a brake, it can win people stopped on the brink of sin, before the boundary goodness, darkness-light … There swagger wagon yet again claiming that it does not need brakes? 
To understand the psychology of devotees so they can see the other honest answers may shock and even cause an aversion to the dialogue. One time, no religion is the mouth, it is open to the religious history of just one word item: None. Other times: Salary. Someone explain his salary that is honest, that is those who do not pay the religion, deviant cult. There is literally not know that? 
But to think the same, saying that your religion are not honest but not necessarily honest. Please take a look, all religions are true pillars of 5 elements:
– Is the concept of a supreme being.
– There founders.
– There scriptures.
– There are sacred places of worship.
– Practice chanting.
Considering the five criteria, then does that have few people in this world really is not religious? Many neo-existing things meet the above, the fact also is a kind of religion. People at a certain level would be a map of the teachers. Other conflicts arose whether ideology is a kind of religious crusade, either one way or the other? 
Every intelligent person has his your religion, Bernard Shaw once said that. A lot of famous people, many intellectuals that are in a god, a saint, and his inner god hard to bow before God of a crowd. In every human intelligence has its own ideology, its own world, and the world was large enough to cover the outside of the human world. 
This does not mean that God the inner, inner world is the threat of conflict with religion and society, to the world of humanity implies Nor are all intellectuals all atheists. There are many devotees behind the other, especially on the planet panic and unrest today, especially in the twenty-first century that someone called “religious century”. 
On the other hand there are also religious is not something to flaunt. Khushwant Singh writer ever criticized some Indian prime minister to attend the ceremony at the temple before TV cameras. According to him, religion is a very personal thing, a Hindu politician should worship only at home, should not heavily visited leading Christian churches, Islam … as to perform or bragging. A politician can not belong to any religion separate. 
Like a politician should not belong to a private impress a certain country. If that is not a man of all religions, of all countries, the division is catastrophic potential risks.
A friend I never identified themselves as atheist or non-religious. Is not that the mark was not used as directed jewelry, know what is beautiful or not beautiful. Simply answer this too easy, too hasty, while each man was not fully understand their inner world, and not a small part. Asked what religion, never told her he was an agnostic, a man who said that cognition only what belongs to the material, and what belongs to the spirit, in religion, in the form Supreme is agnostic. How people can say yes or hurry before the problem is not that. Could it have easy access to it? 
Agnostic is not a clever answer, again tinged with philosophy, key to avoiding debate, avoiding conflict, in order to preserve the prestige and honor for a smart intellectuals. It should be affordable answers and know of all those who do not tolerate any religion and considered himself something well known. Be cautious, he said, those women who know it all, the Mr. and Ms. Know-All. 
Back to question your religion? Many overseas Vietnamese are calmly replied: I am not religious. It asked: So you believe what? Very brisk side always we answer: I only believe in science.
But religion is science. Interlocutor said. 

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét